They still can’t admit it…
The New York Post went scorched earth on The New York Times this week after a Times article used language that suggested Hunter Biden’s laptop, which the FBI recently used in a federal case to convict Hunter Biden on federal gun charges, still may not be 100% authentic.
Now The Post asks: What’s it going to take?
From The New York Post:
Facts are stubborn things, John Adams said, but not as stubborn as the New York Times.
Despite federal prosecutors, investigative journalists and forensics analysts all confirming that Hunter Biden’s laptop is the genuine article, the Gray Lady remains desperate to tear it down.
The latest broadside is an article published Wednesday, “Hunter Biden’s Laptop, Revealed by New York Post, Comes Back to Haunt Him.”
So far, so good.
Then we get to the subhead, which echoes language in Katie Robertson’s dispatch: “Many claims about the laptop’s contents have not been proved, but it played a role in the prosecution of Mr. Biden over a firearm purchase.”
Many claims?
Name one bit of the laptop that has been proven WRONG!
The article mentions our first story from the laptop, in October 14, 2020, which shows Hunter working to arrange a meeting between a Ukrainian energy official and his father.
Vadym Pozharskyi was an adviser to the board of Ukrainian gas company Burisma, which was paying Hunter Biden $83,000 a month.
In May 2014, Pozharskyi emailed Hunter, asking for “advice on how you could use your influence” on the company’s behalf.
Then, in April 2015, Pozharskyi writes another email: “Dear Hunter, thank you for inviting me to DC and giving an opportunity to meet your father and spent [sic] some time together. It’s realty [sic] an honor and pleasure.”
This correspondence is real and verified.
Read the full op-ed over at The New York Post:
NY Times still can’t admit Hunter Biden’s laptop is real! What’s it going to take? https://t.co/6baeIXWglk pic.twitter.com/5Pi5mBhwNd
— NY Post Opinion (@NYPostOpinion) June 12, 2024
